Comments on: Episode 134: Unarmed and Unharmed

By: Rock

Rock — Tue, 17 Apr 2012 06:59:39 +0000

I would like to show my thanks to you just for bialing me out of this problem. Right after researching by way of the world wide web and seeing strategies which are not helpful, I figured my entire life was gone. Existing minus the approaches towards the issues you’ve fixed by means of your main guideline is really a crucial case, and ones that would have in a negative way damaged my entire career if I hadn’t discovered your website. Your primary ability and kindness in playing with all points was precious. I’m not sure what I would have done if I hadn’t come across such a answer like this. I’m able to at this moment look forward to my future. Thanks for your time quite a lot for this impressive and result oriented guide. I won’t be reluctant to refer the web sites to any person who really should receive direction on this dilemma.

By: Mike

Mike — Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:30:43 +0000

-Yep the acceleration time is so short it doesn’t have much bearing.
-Don’t forget the explosive gasses that eject the bullet increase the accelerating mass.
-And the fact that the gun Jamie and Adam held experienced the full opposite forces that the accelerating bullet caused, whereas the bullet shot to the gun only imparted a fraction since it broke down and continued to fly everywhere in still high speed.

I agree with that the holder of the gun will grip it tighter than usual, you just can’t help it.

Hope I made sense to yall. :)

By: Amber

Amber — Sun, 05 Jun 2011 17:21:29 +0000

the 20 mph was a simulation with a smaller bus almost toy size. everythign fit to the scale factor.

By: C.J. Brunson

C.J. Brunson — Sun, 13 Feb 2011 21:35:08 +0000

I read these comments. I see a flaw in the handgun rig that no one mentioned. Here is the problem It is all about weight. You added weight to the pistol. More weight = less recoil. The question of acceleration is a small one. The bullet still gets full acceleration at the time it leaves the barrel. Around 900 feet per second. It will travel the barrel length in less than 1/1000th of a second.

By: bumpski

bumpski — Sun, 16 Jan 2011 22:15:35 +0000

“Sqeezer says:
The tests that use a second barrel or a second handle have a severe flaw.”
Sqeezer is exactly right: If the force when fired was the same as at impact, the bullet should shatter before it leaves the barrel!
I’m afraid one of the Mythbusters is going to have to take the bullet!

By: Gariandos

Gariandos — Thu, 13 Jan 2011 01:02:03 +0000

I doubt it would happen, the problem is the bullet is facing much more resistance underwater and it would no doubt mushroom, meaning flatten out due to resistance, before it could even make it to the chain.

By: Glen

Glen — Sat, 08 Jan 2011 21:38:38 +0000

It is easy to hold a gun tight enough to not get it knockled out of your hand if you know it is comming. Even if it is a randome time they are still expecting a kick out of the normal range so it is not a good test. I have actually seen a gun shot out of a persons hand by a sniper during a police standoff and he did not get any injury. It worked because he was not expecting it.

By: logan

logan — Sat, 01 Jan 2011 18:26:09 +0000

try diffrent tires on jumping bus :)
it maye work better

By: Holdaro

Holdaro — Wed, 03 Nov 2010 03:08:18 +0000

Yeah and in the making of part of the film, they used a huge ramp (which was meracuously edited out) and the bus was travelling between 70 & 80 MPH

By: Chas Newport

Chas Newport — Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:52:35 +0000

Their two guns at 90 degrees test rig for the first item was flawed. A bullet hitting a gun slows down in a shorter distance and exerts greater force than a bullet accelerating along a barrel over a greater distance.