Comments on: Episode 104: NASA Moon Landing http://mythbustersresults.com/nasa-moon-landing Outcomes from all MythBusters Episodes Mon, 21 May 2012 05:52:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: twerpson http://mythbustersresults.com/nasa-moon-landing/comment-page-5#comment-13745 twerpson Sat, 19 May 2012 12:13:44 +0000 http://mythbustersresults.com/?p=206#comment-13745 I've been studying the moon landings recently and concluded that they happened on phobos not our moon and we were assisted by extraterrestrials.Prove that wrong you septics!!!!!!!!!!!!! I’ve been studying the moon landings recently and concluded that they happened on phobos not our moon and we were assisted by extraterrestrials.Prove that wrong you septics!!!!!!!!!!!!!

]]> By: kenneth huber http://mythbustersresults.com/nasa-moon-landing/comment-page-5#comment-13718 kenneth huber Thu, 10 May 2012 13:30:16 +0000 http://mythbustersresults.com/?p=206#comment-13718 i have 4 original NASA slides ( glass with silver binding the glass) marked by nasa these are the real deal, interested? i have 4 original NASA slides ( glass with silver binding the glass) marked by nasa these are the real deal, interested?

]]> By: kp http://mythbustersresults.com/nasa-moon-landing/comment-page-5#comment-13693 kp Tue, 01 May 2012 14:12:37 +0000 http://mythbustersresults.com/?p=206#comment-13693 if you werent dumb. you could clearly see nasa is lieing if you werent dumb. you could clearly see nasa is lieing

]]> By: kp http://mythbustersresults.com/nasa-moon-landing/comment-page-5#comment-13692 kp Tue, 01 May 2012 14:11:54 +0000 http://mythbustersresults.com/?p=206#comment-13692 if you arent dumb. you would clearly see nasa is the biggest lier ever. they never made it too the moon if you arent dumb. you would clearly see nasa is the biggest lier ever. they never made it too the moon

]]> By: bobby http://mythbustersresults.com/nasa-moon-landing/comment-page-5#comment-13675 bobby Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:18:33 +0000 http://mythbustersresults.com/?p=206#comment-13675 agreed just because the reflectors are there dosnt mean anything agreed just because the reflectors are there dosnt mean anything

]]> By: bobby http://mythbustersresults.com/nasa-moon-landing/comment-page-5#comment-13674 bobby Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:15:58 +0000 http://mythbustersresults.com/?p=206#comment-13674 why wasnt there any stars in the sky? in any of the pictures? why wasnt there any stars in the sky? in any of the pictures?

]]> By: bobby http://mythbustersresults.com/nasa-moon-landing/comment-page-5#comment-13673 bobby Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:14:28 +0000 http://mythbustersresults.com/?p=206#comment-13673 Hey Brad you ever think they could of just sent probes out to the moon to place the reflectors out there? i guess not just because we put stuff on the moon doesnt say we were there, i watched a video in sociology on the conspiracy video and myth busters dont explain why there isnt any types of stars in the sky in any of the pictures Hey Brad you ever think they could of just sent probes out to the moon to place the reflectors out there? i guess not just because we put stuff on the moon doesnt say we were there, i watched a video in sociology on the conspiracy video and myth busters dont explain why there isnt any types of stars in the sky in any of the pictures

]]> By: JD http://mythbustersresults.com/nasa-moon-landing/comment-page-5#comment-13664 JD Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:10:11 +0000 http://mythbustersresults.com/?p=206#comment-13664 I think they need to bust 1 more, Van Allen Radiation belt. in 1998 we flew the space shuttle 350 miles above our atmosphere, our astronauts started experiencing streaking lights and seeing "shooting stars" with their eyes closed. This was affects from radiation penetrating their body. NOW in space the radiation is 10x more dangerous than on earth because of cosmic radiation which can rip tear your DNA . Now please explain how we flew 25,000 miles THROUGH this radiation in 1969, when in 1998 we could only be 650 miles from where it starts and started experiencing problems? tldr: Van Allen radiation belt starts at 1,000 miles out of our atmosphere and ends 25,000 miles (every mission in history has been UNDER this 1,000 miles, usually under 200 to be safe EXCEPT the Apollo missions.) I think they need to bust 1 more, Van Allen Radiation belt.

in 1998 we flew the space shuttle 350 miles above our atmosphere, our astronauts started experiencing streaking lights and seeing “shooting stars” with their eyes closed. This was affects from radiation penetrating their body. NOW in space the radiation is 10x more dangerous than on earth because of cosmic radiation which can rip tear your DNA . Now please explain how we flew 25,000 miles THROUGH this radiation in 1969, when in 1998 we could only be 650 miles from where it starts and started experiencing problems?

tldr: Van Allen radiation belt starts at 1,000 miles out of our atmosphere and ends 25,000 miles (every mission in history has been UNDER this 1,000 miles, usually under 200 to be safe EXCEPT the Apollo missions.)

]]> By: JohnJay60 http://mythbustersresults.com/nasa-moon-landing/comment-page-5#comment-13660 JohnJay60 Sun, 22 Apr 2012 20:49:53 +0000 http://mythbustersresults.com/?p=206#comment-13660 And I like the Saturday Night Live theory that Reagan believed he was filming a movie, and reading from a script, during his years as President ... And I like the Saturday Night Live theory that Reagan believed he was filming a movie, and reading from a script, during his years as President …

]]> By: JohnJay60 http://mythbustersresults.com/nasa-moon-landing/comment-page-5#comment-13659 JohnJay60 Sun, 22 Apr 2012 20:48:50 +0000 http://mythbustersresults.com/?p=206#comment-13659 How does returning to the moon stop China from making its initial visit? All subsequent probes and telescopes looking at old landing sites find the evidence required of actual visits. How does returning to the moon stop China from making its initial visit? All subsequent probes and telescopes looking at old landing sites find the evidence required of actual visits.

]]>