Comments on: Episode 104: NASA Moon Landing

By: Moron

Moron — Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:27:16 +0000

You have never put your message on something which the moron believers call the Internet where imaginary people can exchange crazy messages at the speed of light. We have never invented the Internet – get over it.

By: Moron

Moron — Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:20:28 +0000

The Internet is an illusion created by the freemasons. The Twin Towers have never existed and all islamist terrorists from Bali to Madrid to London to Mumbai to New York to Kabul to Baghdad are Mossad agents just like the Jewish actor who played Bin Laden until he retired on George Bush’s ranch. If only people could get rid of the alien implants and realize that pictures cannot travel through air and man cannot fly to the moon.

By: Moron

Moron — Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:04:35 +0000

Bush also faked the invention of the Internet and smartphones that can fake-store entire movies in the palm of your hand. There are millions of crazy morons around who actually type messages into keyboards hoping that someone on the other side of the planet will be able to read that. I guess soon they are gonna wanna make us believe that pictures can be sent through nothing but thin air and the earth has existed for over 6000 years. I guess you and me are the only sane people in a world of morons. (sent from my iphone somewhere in Europe 10000 years in the future from your vantage point)

By: lolwut

lolwut — Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:37:02 +0000

If there really is an American flag on the moon, the Chinese could bring back and auction it on eBay.

Pure pwnage.

By: lolwut

lolwut — Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:26:42 +0000

So it only took 6 trips to ascertain that is was all a ridiculous waste of time, money & effort? Interesting.

By: lolwut

lolwut — Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:58:25 +0000

Using that as a point of argument is simply fallacious. You’re assuming peoples of a totally different mindset would exhibit the same (egotistic) behavior.

Perhaps if Russia went to the moon then the Americans might have tried everything to disprove it, but that presumption has no bearing on what the Russians might or might not do.

By: rsduhamel

rsduhamel — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 04:16:03 +0000

BTW, before someone says it would be impossible to see an Apollo spacecraft on the way to the moon through a small telescope, it’s not. Someone in a network of amateur radio operators, who were also amateur astronomers. had spotted the spacecraft and broadcast the coordinates to the rest. I was with a group of amateur astronomers that included one of the amateur radio operators. The spacecraft appeared as an occasional faint, barely visible flash through the telescope. Actually there were six objects visible. They were the Apollo spacecraft complex, the S-IVB stage of the Saturn V and four panels shrouded the lunar module before it was attached to the command module.

By: IronMaiden

IronMaiden — Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:57:03 +0000

Moon landing was an ilusion.
Life is just an ilusion.

By: The Floorist

The Floorist — Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:54:37 +0000

My friend and I are both 47 year-old skeptics on the ‘manned’ lunar landings. We both were young children at that time and remember the events quite lucidly. The recent NASA Mars program failed at its first attempt to land a probe on Mars and the second attempt at “bouncing” a probe was successful to a point. I still have the National Geographic issue detailing the Mars probe’s excursion and the photos are stunning to say the least. It would be difficult to honestly say the Mars probe was a hoax because the technology and evidence is irrefutable, unlike the lunar landings videos and pictures from 40 years ago which bear as much circumspect evidence as there is undeniable truth. Moon rocks, coincidentally, have been shown to be identical to earth rocks. Saying those rocks are from the moon becomes a moot point.
Obviously our NASA shuttle program has just recently been scuttled for budgetary and compulsory reasons. Why? It’s clear the shuttle program suffered tragic losses and it appears to the casual observer that our technology is still in its infancy to continuously put man in space and safely return without the possibility of disastrous failure. Now NASA is contracting to design and build a new-age jet airplane that will carry a newly designed space shuttle to the outer reaches of our earth’s atmosphere and launch shuttles without using giant rocket thrusters, thus saving a great deal of money, time, equipment and quite likely lives. The new Space Station is really our next giant leap for man-kind and is actually really cool to see streaking across the night sky. I encourage anyone who hasn’t seen it take the time to watch it when it’s scheduled to fly over your part of the country.
My argument for the falsifying of manned lunar landings is best defined by this simple question: If the Hubble space telescope can take alarmingly beautiful images of the Mars probe and time lapse its trip along the rim of that giant crater, and photograph incredible nebulae, distant solar systems and other heavenly bodies millions of light years away, why then can the Hubble not show a simple image of an American flag, rover tracks, footprints and other clear pictures of Apollo junk?
Saying the lens is too small and would need to be 75 meters wide and that it would be a waste of time to aim the Hubble at the moon is about as believable as dust settling everywhere BUT on the LEM. Any telescopic picture I can find of the Apollo junk left behind is blurry and in some cases appears to be superimposed, and quite simply isn’t as undeniable as a satellite image of my friggin license plate.

I’m not saying man didn’t put crap on the moon, I’m just saying I doubt man actually walked on the moon.

By: rsduhamel

rsduhamel — Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:56:42 +0000

Dust doesn’t billow in a vacuum. It would blow straight away from the lander in a parabolic arc and stay where it hit the lunar surface.