Subscribe

MythBusters Episode 136: Hidden Nasties

Air Date: December 16, 2009

It is feasible for a soda can to be contaminated with rat urine and subsequently transmit deadly viruses to humans.

busted

To create a control sample, Adam and Jamie spread out 1,000 aluminum soda cans, cleaned the top surfaces of the cans, and released 40 rats to walk on them for 90 minutes. Viewing the cans under a black light clearly showed that many of them became contaminated with rat urine. Next, they collected 1,000 cans from a variety of locations across San Francisco. Viewing these cans under a black light revealed that most of them also had organic substances on them, but it was not clear what those substances were. To find out what was on the cans, Adam and Jamie took swabbed samples to UC Berkeley, where a mass spectrometer was used to identify the chemical compounds. As expected, the control contained 15 proteins that indicated rat urine. However, the test sample did not contain any compounds indicating rat urine. Furthermore, a professor of epidemiology at UC Berkeley explained that any dangerous viruses contained in rat urine would not survive on the exposed tops of aluminum cans.

Many objects that people touch every day are dirtier than a toilet seat.

confirmed

Adam and Jamie chose a total of 8 objects to test for cleanliness: toilet seat, money, kitchen sponge, hotel room remote, computer keyboard, light switch, cell phone, and shopping cart. They swabbed each surface for 10 seconds and created Petri dishes from the swabs that incubated overnight. Their first method of measurement was to count the number of microorganism colonies on each dish. They found that the toilet seat sample actually had the fewest colonies, while the kitchen sponge sample had more than they could count:

  1. kitchen sponge (most colonies)
  2. money
  3. light switch
  4. computer keyboard
  5. hotel remote
  6. shopping cart
  7. cell phone
  8. toilet seat (fewest colonies)

However, they always wanted to account for the “nastiness” or harmfulness of the types of organisms on each Petri dish, so they had a microbiologist re-rank the samples. The list was as follows.

  1. kitchen sponge (most nasty)
  2. money
  3. light switch
  4. computer keyboard
  5. toilet seat
  6. cell phone
  7. shopping cart
  8. hotel remote (least nasty)

Finally, Adam and Jamie decided they needed a larger sample size to provide better results. They enlisted a group of biology students at UC Berkeley to collect more samples from the top five dirtiest surfaces. After collecting and analyzing these samples, the final list was as follows.

  1. kitchen sponge (most dirty)
  2. money
  3. computer keyboard
  4. toilet seat
  5. light switch (least dirty)

At 50 mph (80 kph), a sports car can launch off a small ramp and skip across a 100 ft (30 m) lake.

busted

To test this myth, Tory, Grant, and Jessi built dug a 100 ft trench at the end of a test track and filled it with water. They did not have the means to use a Lamborghini, as shown in the movie, but settled for a car of similar size and weight. They equipped the car to drive by remote control and drove it off a small ramp at 50 mph. Rather than skipping, the car hit nose-first and flipped end-over-end. Grant explained that the stunt in the movie was likely achieved with a platform just under the surface of the water and with weights in the car to keep it level.

(This myth came from the movie Cannonball.)

At high speeds, a sports car can skip across a 100 ft (30 m) lake.

confirmed

Tory, Grant, and Jessi again substituted an average car for a sports car, but equipped it with a nitrous oxide system to increase its top speed. Small scale tests showed that skipping worked better without a ramp, so no ramp was used for the full scale test. When the team drove the car onto the artificial lake, it skipped twice and continued driving on the other side.

Watch Mythbusters on SuperPass

15 Comments

  1. eric plunkett:

    the lambo engine is not mounted in the front of the car unlike the one used in the show, that has a major effect on why the front of the car dropped and the car flipped

    December 17, 2009 at 12:29 AM
  2. Frank Ferrara:

    Thank you Eric. I have always enjoyed watching Mythbusters however they do make numerous mistakes. In this case, the mid mounting position of the Lamborghini engine. The episode even showed them removing the mid mounted engine from the Lamborghini model on the scale test. I am also surprised that they did not consider the depth of the water or the underpannel(skidplate) layout on any of the cars. They got lucky becuase the second car they tested with happened to be mid engine. It would be nice to see a little more accuracy in their tests.

    December 17, 2009 at 2:18 AM
  3. Matt:

    Eric and Frank, the MythBusters claimed that their test car had the same weight distribution as a Lamborghini – at least showing that they did consider this.

    December 17, 2009 at 4:00 AM
  4. Wiscfan:

    For the car skipping across the water, if you look at the movie clip you can see that there is not an actual ramp. Rather, the road is elevated a little higher than the water. I think they need to revisit this and find the minimum speed needed to skip the car across the water without a ramp.

    December 17, 2009 at 5:33 PM
  5. rgra66:

    Eric the full size cars they used were both fieros all production fiero were mid engine not front engine cars.

    December 20, 2009 at 9:50 PM
  6. chuck:

    Love your show,theirs some guy’s that are trying to immitate but none even come close ,hope you guys keep me intertained for years to come,Thanks Guys and Kari-Really need to get her back My family never misses a show…

    January 5, 2010 at 10:00 PM
  7. Drtracr16:

    First, I wanted to say, I love your show and think you do an outstanding job!
    In the movie, there were no ramps used. If you look more carefully, there was a DIP! The dip dropped down then back up above the water level slightly. What that did was; when the car dropped down in the dip and started back up in that of short distance, it loaded the front springs on the car, to make it rise higher than the rear. When you make that happen it does not matter where the engine is located or how deep, the water is for the first few skips. Although, I am sure a rear mounted engine would be better but no skid plates
    When it was re-enacted on TV, the ramp did not load the front springs as much as it did the rear, making it nose dive! I was watching the show almost yelling; that is not the way it was on the movie
    Please watch this scene and consider trying it again

    January 12, 2010 at 11:27 AM
  8. michael:

    i would like to say hi and ive heard a myth that sound waves can make somthing float so i thought i would submit the myth and im australian

    January 13, 2010 at 4:28 PM
  9. john degeorge:

    will you use less gas if the tailgate is down on a pick-up truck while driving on the highway ?????

    January 19, 2010 at 2:42 PM
  10. Sophie:

    is time travel possible?

    January 20, 2010 at 9:03 AM
  11. Hannah:

    heyy myth busters,
    i have a science fair project to do in a month and i have no idea what to do for it… can u help me out??

    January 21, 2010 at 9:11 PM
  12. jim spath:

    Love your show. The lengths you floks go to in order to satisfy your fans is awesom! Glad to see Miss Combs on the show. She IS a really good metal worker. When is Kari comiong back?

    January 23, 2010 at 4:47 AM
  13. bbj:

    you people suck

    February 5, 2010 at 10:21 AM
  14. bsheldon:

    they already did the tailgate down mileage myth several times.. turns out better mileage with the tailgate up.

    February 9, 2010 at 1:49 AM

Leave a Reply