Episode 175: Flying Guillotine

Air Date: October 26, 2011

C-4 plastic explosive is stable enough to burn without exploding and can be used to cook food, but a mechanical shock to the burning material will set it off.

confirmed (1st half) / busted (2nd half)

At the bomb range, Adam and Jamie set up a piece of C-4 and ignited it remotely. The material burned for 2 minutes without exploding and registered temperatures of 1,000 °F (538 °C). Setting up a stove from two bricks and an oven rack, they were able to warm a military MRE ration somewhat. For comparison purposes, they ignited 1 oz (28 g) samples of C-4 and three other fuels (hexamethylenetetramine, 1,3,5-trioxane, and chafing-dish fuel) under pots of water and measured the peak temperature and time to burn out. HMTA achieved a higher temperature than the other three, but the speed with which the C-4 burned led Adam to decide that it could be used as a workable cooking fuel.

For sensitivity tests, they rigged a full, 7 lb (3.2 kg) cooking pot to fall on a piece of burning C-4 from 3 ft (91 cm), then set up a robotic leg in a combat boot to stomp on it. Neither of these trials produced an explosion, so they dropped a 90 lb (41 kg) anvil on the material, without success. Shooting at the C-4 with different .308 rifle cartridges — standard, tracer, incendiary — failed to trigger an explosion as well. Finally, Adam and Jamie set up a thermite charge to drip molten material at 4,500 °F (2,482 °C) onto the C-4, thinking that extreme heat might make it sensitive enough to detonate. This test failed as well, and Jamie noted that C-4 was formulated to be stable unless set off by a blasting cap. He and Adam judged the first half of the myth as confirmed, but the second half as busted.

The 18th-century Chinese designed a tethered throwing weapon that could decapitate an opponent and carry the head back to the thrower. Inspired by appearances of such weapons in martial-arts movies.

plausible

The Build Team set three criteria for success: ease of throwing, enough power to cleanly remove a head, and ability to contain it while being retrieved. After each member designed a different prototype, the three devices were tested against a pig neck with Buster’s head mounted on it. All three could be thrown to land on the head from 10 ft (3.0 m), with Tory’s — a spinning ring on a cable, with a salad bowl to hold the head – coming the closest to a full decapitation.

After a few refinements to his design, he was able to take the head off and have it retained within the device. Kari and Grant set up a combat situation, involving one moving enemy dummy and a second that could pop up from behind a screen. Tory hit the pop-up enemy with a glancing blow and knocked it down, but could not land his device on the moving one. Based on these results, the team decided that the flying guillotine was plausible as an assassination weapon, but not in combat.

4 Comments

  1. Tabitha Jordan says:

    With the C-4 I was wondering why you didn’t try dropping or stomping something on it that was charged with static electricity.

  2. Browneye says:

    Hey Guys, didn’t get to actually see episode 175. You may have covered this in the episode; so I know this may be repetitive… but, what formula of C4 did you use? I suspect you utilized C4 blocks from the Alameda Sheriffs Department, which is most likely a recent formulation with Taggangt in it? The “Myth” I suspect comes from a military safety message stems from the Vietnam Era. The formula for C4 during that time did not have Taggant mixed in with the explosives. As you guys may know, anytime you dilute a mixture it tends to not maintain its original properties. For those out there that understand what I am talking about… “it don’t have the same kick it used to” Older lot’s of C4 are better than the newer lot’s of C4. Any EOD/Bomb Tech out there would most likely agree. Therefore… your results are probably NOT going to match the myth because of that reason. Unless you were of course using the older C4… and I am now an idiot :). As Jamie noted, it has to be stable… us military knuckle draggers are using it right? :) Thanks (A military EOD guy)

  3. KnukLHeaD says:

    I understand that you might label the flying guillotine as merely plausible because yall couldn’t get it to work right. But please remember. Y’all aren’t ninjas.

  4. ThePirate says:

    I think I have a design for a flying guilotine. Grant’s first idea was a good one. My design is based on a bear trap. you only need to use form bear trap mechanism. If you want I can send you the blueprints. That’s all from me for now

Leave a Reply

(required)